Emil Hunefalk

Usability

Posted on | June 28, 2007 | 3 Comments

Having a site everyone can use is obviously something every designer should strive for, but how should we do it, and why are certain methods better than others? As with many other research areas, there are divided opinions also within Usability. Some believe that the Usability rule set could be applied anywhere and goes above everything else, while others believe that usability should go hand in hand with a pleasing design to let the users have a relaxed look while trying to find what they look for. However, all agree that the user come first and the designer opinion last – meaning we must understand the target group to understand how to create the product…

In my first University course in the subject, we were first introduced to this way of thinking by looking at the Usability of real objects, such as kitchen appliances and parking meters. The books we used for a start were Designing visual interfaces by Mullet and Sano and The Design of Everyday Things by Norman – two books I can highly recommend both for a novice in the area and for someone who wants to know more about Usability in general. If you look at everyday things such as stereos, cellphone, laundry machines or even toasters, you can easily notice some part of the object which is more difficult, which is true especially the more advanced objects.

So what can designers, programmers, developers, managers, users and others do to help making for example web applications more user friendly? What can the ordinary man or woman do to help the designer, and what can the annoyed user with no patience do to help the programmer get it right? What can the programmer do to help both designers and users and what can the graphical designer do to help himself and everyone else?

What the users can do is pretty simple to answer – give feedback, comment and tell both what is good and what is not good enough. For this, the designer should give space for simple ways of contact – after all, the users is what should make the site live. However, the designer should still allow some security precautions to avoid spam, which can distract both programmers and designers…

One of the so called gurus of Usability is Jakob Nielsen, creator of the useit website and author of multiple books. If you want something simple and fast to read I recommend his book ‘50 websites deconstructed‘ – but when you look at his own site it’s easy to wonder if he cares at all about the design, and then the thought can be extended

The last course I had in Usability included one of the simplest books on the subject (besides many articles and essays of course) – ‘Don’t make me think‘ by Steve Krug – a well thought out book with simple illustrations and explanations of how the designers and programmers should think, to let the users keep their mind on the intended goal.

Over the next few weeks, I’ll write more about Usability and Accessibility, with simple rules to follow and methods to use – and also include simple analysis of a few websites. You are welcome to make comments here (or send a mail) to ask for an analysis of a specific site, or I’ll find one or a few myself which catches the eye – and maybe I’ll even use my own site as a starting point (yes, I am aware that it has flaws)…

Happy reading :-)

Comments

3 Responses to “Usability”

  1. terry lewis
    June 29th, 2007 @ 14:04 pm

    Thank you for your comments about useability. I can understand the issue concerning the author who does not have a great web site himself. I mange a company that designs, develops and implements web sites as sales and marketing tools for our clients.

    I think the one point you did not mention at all is that there are many times when we would really like to provide a better design or spend more time on a site to improve the useability but we are constrained either by what the client says they want or by a budget limitation.

    I would really appreciate it if you could comment on the web site that is included above. This is a site that was taken on after the project was over a year late and we were given one and a half months to setup a relationship with the backend partner and have the site go live in about 6 weeks.

    Any suggestions, complaints or comments would be greatly appreciated.

  2. EH
    June 29th, 2007 @ 18:03 pm

    Hi Terry,

    Thank you for the comment – of course you are right about the client adding a level of difficulty by for example wanting ‘cool features’ or having a budget.

    Something else which is easy to forget is that users can both be versatile, net savvy and relatively used to advanced features, but still become completely confused when those ‘neat features’ are packaged in a less intuitive way.

    I’ll have a look at the site you posted, and use it as a case study here on my blog, if you don’t mind.

    Have a nice weekend :-)

  3. EH
    July 4th, 2007 @ 6:21 am

    Hey again Terry,

    I looked a bit more on the site – but don’t believe I know enough about the target group and the standards in this type of website to give a good analysis of exactly this site, but have looked around a bit and think of making a comparison between a few different travel sites and common flaws in this type of sites.

    /Emil

Leave a Reply





  • LinkedIn

    If you want to see my LinkedIn profile, click on this button:

    Emil Hunefalk
  • Comments

  • Tag Cloud

    No tags were found that match the criteria given.